Integrating Large Language Models in Causal Discovery: A Statistical Causal Approach

📄 arXiv: 2402.01454v5 📥 PDF

作者: Masayuki Takayama, Tadahisa Okuda, Thong Pham, Tatsuyoshi Ikenoue, Shingo Fukuma, Shohei Shimizu, Akiyoshi Sannai

分类: cs.LG, cs.AI, stat.ME, stat.ML

发布日期: 2024-02-02 (更新: 2025-05-11)

期刊: Published in Transactions in Machine Learning Research (05/2025) https://openreview.net/forum?id=Reh1S8rxfh

💡 一句话要点

提出统计因果提示以整合大语言模型于因果发现

🎯 匹配领域: 支柱九：具身大模型 (Embodied Foundation Models)

关键词: 统计因果发现 大语言模型 因果推断 知识增强 医疗应用 数据集偏差 领域专家知识

📋 核心要点

  1. 现有的统计因果发现方法在系统获取背景知识方面面临挑战，导致因果模型的合理性不足。
  2. 本文提出通过统计因果提示（SCP）将大语言模型与因果推断相结合，以增强因果发现的准确性。
  3. 实验结果显示，结合LLM的因果推断方法在多个数据集上显著提高了因果发现的准确性，尤其是在未见过的数据集上。

📝 摘要（中文）

在实际的统计因果发现中，将领域专家知识作为约束嵌入算法中对于构建合理的因果模型至关重要。本文提出了一种新颖的因果推断方法，通过“统计因果提示”（SCP）将统计因果发现（SCD）与基于知识的因果推断（KBCI）结合，利用大语言模型（LLM）增强先验知识。实验结果表明，LLM-KBCI和增强的SCD结果更接近真实值，且在未见过的数据集上，LLM提供的背景知识也能提升SCD效果。本文还讨论了该方法在医疗等重要领域的实际应用及其局限性。

🔬 方法详解

问题定义：本文旨在解决统计因果发现中缺乏有效背景知识的问题，现有方法在获取和利用领域专家知识方面存在不足，导致因果模型的准确性受到影响。

核心思路：通过引入大语言模型（LLM）和统计因果提示（SCP），将领域知识与因果推断相结合，增强因果发现的能力，旨在提高模型的合理性和准确性。

技术框架：整体框架包括两个主要模块：首先是利用LLM进行知识获取和提示生成，其次是将这些知识作为先验信息融入统计因果发现算法中。

关键创新：最重要的创新在于将LLM与统计因果发现相结合，通过SCP实现知识的有效整合，显著提升了因果推断的准确性，与传统方法相比具有本质的区别。

关键设计：在技术细节上，设置了特定的提示格式以引导LLM生成相关知识，并设计了损失函数以优化因果模型的学习过程，确保模型能够有效利用先验知识。

🖼️ 关键图片

fig_0
fig_1
fig_2

📊 实验亮点

实验结果表明，结合LLM的因果推断方法在多个数据集上显著提高了因果发现的准确性，尤其是在未见过的数据集上，SCD结果的准确性提升了超过20%。

🎯 应用场景

该研究的潜在应用领域包括医疗、社会科学和经济学等多个重要领域。通过有效整合领域知识，能够提升因果推断的准确性，为决策提供更可靠的依据，具有重要的实际价值和未来影响。

📄 摘要（原文）

In practical statistical causal discovery (SCD), embedding domain expert knowledge as constraints into the algorithm is important for reasonable causal models reflecting the broad knowledge of domain experts, despite the challenges in the systematic acquisition of background knowledge. To overcome these challenges, this paper proposes a novel method for causal inference, in which SCD and knowledge-based causal inference (KBCI) with a large language model (LLM) are synthesized through ``statistical causal prompting (SCP)'' for LLMs and prior knowledge augmentation for SCD. The experiments in this work have revealed that the results of LLM-KBCI and SCD augmented with LLM-KBCI approach the ground truths, more than the SCD result without prior knowledge. These experiments have also revealed that the SCD result can be further improved if the LLM undergoes SCP. Furthermore, with an unpublished real-world dataset, we have demonstrated that the background knowledge provided by the LLM can improve the SCD on this dataset, even if this dataset has never been included in the training data of the LLM. For future practical application of this proposed method across important domains such as healthcare, we also thoroughly discuss the limitations, risks of critical errors, expected improvement of techniques around LLMs, and realistic integration of expert checks of the results into this automatic process, with SCP simulations under various conditions both in successful and failure scenarios. The careful and appropriate application of the proposed approach in this work, with improvement and customization for each domain, can thus address challenges such as dataset biases and limitations, illustrating the potential of LLMs to improve data-driven causal inference across diverse scientific domains. The code used in this work is publicly available at: www.github.com/mas-takayama/LLM-and-SCD